Same‑day aerodynamics insight from the geometry you already have.
Quick‑start tutorials to simulate aircraft, UAVs, rockets & more.
HIST (proprietary) + RANS/k‑epsilon for credible engineering results.
Experimental results from NACA Report No. 647. Comparisons of CL & CD vs. AoA show good agreement for the NACA 0012 wing.
Experiment results from NASA Technical Report 2772. Comparisons of CL vs. CD, shows good agreement for the Cessna 210.
ONERA M‑6 wing at M=0.8395, AoA=3.06°. Shown is the Cp distribution at y/b=0.8 which is often very difficult to validate.
HL‑20 at M=1.2, AoA=12°: NASA TM 4117 (CL = 0.48, CD = 0.24 & CM = -0.042) compares well with CFD (CL = 0.41, CD = 0.25 & CM = -0.0387)
Proprietary algorithms. High-fidelity CFD. Privacy. No hidden costs💰
Read in your aircraft design from OpenVSP or CAD (STL file).
Set speed, AoA, sideslip, altitude and simulation resolution.
Generate the volume grid automatically for repeatable trades.
Get updated values of lift, drag and moment coefficients as it runs.
Aerodynamics Studies Made Accurate & Easy. Any Questions 🙋♂️
From startups to classrooms to established R&D teams.



